EDUCATION, PROPAGANDA Talk with Andy C Hitchcock 4 Oct 2017 10 am 125 words per minute = 6,900 in 55 mins 2,800 words here ______________________________________ I want to discuss propaganda and education and how they intertwine. I'll choose to start with Bertrand Russell. He's not as well-known as he was. I'll use his 'History of Western Philosophy' of 1945 to start. Russell had a standard Victorian format for the history of the world: Greece and Rome, after a few nods to Babylon, Persia, Egypt; then Christianity and the Middle Ages; then modern times, with partly-understood science and partly-understood quotes democracy unquotes and omitted finance, and a rather naive victor's view of war. Russell regarded the 13th century Roman Catholic synthesis as being as complete as it could be, though soft-pedalling violent conversions, truths about money, and putting-down of heresies. His 'History' s a very good book, in a precise sense, of giving a good overview, even though it has errors. (Harold Hillman the biologist once said to me a book by Steven Rose, on cell biology, was a very good book: I was puzzled and asked him what he meant, and he was saying that, if you want to know current mistakes, it was a good summary. In this sense Russell's History is a good book). Russell's format is typical of learned books in the 19th century: I have here J M Robertson, a short history of morality. And here's Joseph McCabe, 'History of Women'. [Green? Winwood Reade? Andrew Dickson's war of science with theology etc] This applied up to 1917, where even academics began to notice new things, which they mostly described as 'revolutions' following the so-called 'French Revolution'. To his death, Russell always referred to the Jewish USSR as 'Russia'. But even after 1945, Hugh Trevor-Roper, a regius professor of history, thought that Caesar and his wars (in Latin) were ideal training for English public schoolboys in the 19th century. Russell once wrote [on J S Mill] that a subject and a predicate make a proposition, was a two-thousand-year philosophical error. This was a typically Russellian word-based worry. He failed to notice the possibilities of lies, obstructions, and persuasions. It can be argued convincingly that 'philosophy' as an official subject concerns any subject, provided it is verbose and practically unimportant. I'll look at a few examples. As with many rationalists, Russell hoped future generations would not believe in faith, but would 'substitute loyalty for evidence'. And Russell thought it was possible to discover what was happening in the world: all you have to do is simply read another newspaper, which prints the opposite views. He had no idea that good ideas can be submerged by a flood of output, as his book on German Social Democrats shows. What's called 'teleology' shows Russell's omission. He says, rightly, that 'cause' can be used in a mechanical sense, but it can also be used in a human affairs sense. 'Why does a baker make bread? - Because people will be hungry' is one of his examples. Russell says: 'I do not see how it could have been known in advance which of these questions science ought to ask... But experience has shown that the mechanistic question leads to scientific knowledge...' Russell perceives just too alternatives; he hasn't noticed the possibility, characteristic of Jews, that destruction of evidence, repeated lies, bribery, assertion with violence make a third option, which of course is parasitic on general knowledge. And has been for at least two thousand years. I've discussed Victorian attitudes in the 19th century. Let's update with an infusion of reality. Many people must have noticed the Jew-inspired promotion of black hate against whites; there are plenty of examples, from the deliberate suppression of black violence such as rape, to jewish media campaigns of the Trayvon Martin type, going back at least to Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s, of course part of the divide-and-try-to-rule policy of Jews. If you've noticed this, you're in a position to understand how (for example) Germans and Russians for example must have felt the same manufactured hatred from British and US soldiers. In the 19th century, this is Hilaire Belloc in his book 'the Jews' (1920) '... rise to monopoly of the Jewish international news agents.. Reuters.., and the presence of Jews as correspondents, [e.g.] ... Opper, a Bohemian Jew... under the false name of “de Blowitz” ... Paris correspondent for The Times...' In this way Jews, with their international networking, produced a slow drip of anti-German, anti-Russian, anti-American, anti-British stuff as required. Probably this was occasional: Germans showing typical unreasonableness; Russian Tsarist autocratic intransigence or whatever. it's easy to imagine complacent Britons, imbibing anti-German feeling with their mother's milk'. With more imagination, we may visualise German readers fed material on British cunning and deceit. And French readers on perfidious Albion. The more isolated the country, the more feasible this is. The USA is a perfect example of a country very largely colonised by Jewish propaganda and militarism, though to its credit Americans went some way to counter this, though, so far, it has been a weak force. In fact the tireless Miles Mathis has come to believe that most, perhaps all, US presidents have been Jews, and presumably therefore the USA was set up from the start as a Bank of England Jewish state, complete with blather about pioneers and the greatest generation. They can't admit that they lied since the 18th century, or at least not yet, but this may explain differences from Europe -- money priority, little genuine history, not much community feeling. Let's see more on propaganda and censorship and quotes education unquote. In 1945, Russell wrote 'The Bomb and Civilization' in response to Hiroshima and Nagasaki propaganda. So far as I know, Russell never had any doubts about the supposed facts of nuclear weapons, and must have been used as a 'useful idiot'. A Jew in Canada, Cyrus Eaton, hosted the 'Pugwash' meetings. About twenty years later, he wrote 'War Crimes in Vietnam', which makes me think he was honest, and not a crypto-Jew. This book is one of the few not reprinted by his literary assigns - his image is as a philosopher above mere politics. There's an exchange of letters with the New York Times, as far as I know owned then as now by Jews such as Sulzberger and Ochs. I put a different book on Vietnam on my site; I don't think anyone else has. Russell regarded scum such as Kissinger and Johnson as Americans. This is an important issue: supporters of Jews might consider whether they really want to side with was killers in Russia, Germany, and Vietnam as their allies. Vietnam had been part of the French Empire, or what was called the French Empire, and has a tiny proportion of Roman Catholics. Unfortunately in my view this spoils Hoffman's work on Judaics. "It has been fought from the air with napalm and fragmentation bombs, helicopter gunships and pellet bombs, the spraying of poisons on thousands of acres of crops and the use of enormous high explosive weapons. Civilian areas have been declared "free fire zones" and the policy has been one of mechanical slaughter. On the ground, "search and destroy" missions have used gas in lethal quantities, the killing of prisoners, and systematic interrogation under electrical and other tortures." His 'On American Violence' I think was published after his death. He wote 'the entire American establishment is on trial' Nuclear material is a good example of propaganda: I replaced a long detailed forum online (dated 2011-2012) which I recommend to anyone wishing to look into the whole issue and try to decide for themselves how much was yet another Jewish fraud. I think the nuclear issue may be the biggest fraud of all, though of course accurate figures are not likely to be easy to find. And in any case it may be second to the entire Jewish banking fraud. I have here December 1969's 'National Geographic' with the cover photo of a fake astronaut, a thin 33 rpm record (not CD), and about 60 pages of fake photos - astonishing. And possibly the third largest fraud is the holohoax, and we should include the censorship of mass deaths in the Soviet Union and Ukraine, plus Germans after the Second World War as partially publicised by James Bacque. My best guess at present is that the Jewish policy is not to maximise money or assets, but to maximise collective deaths. Since about 1920 (and the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan) they have targeted whites, with presumably instinctive homicidal impulses. A newish interpretation of Hitler and Stalin as that, between them, they arranged mass killings of whites; certainly a convincing case can be made - Stalin killing Russian educated elites, and Latvians, Poles etc, and probably entire nations; and Hitler who *may* have been a mimic all along. The best case known to me is Miles Mathis's pdf called hiller.pdf In passing, let's note the 'hostile elite' idea of Kevin MacDonald. MacDonald, in my view wrongly, because whites have been as lethal with each other, usually I like to hope under Jewish pressure, as any other groups. But of course it's media censorship that allows MacDonald to make this error: he understands Jews perverting the academic world, but remains somewhat naive about 'news' sources. He speaks well on the grotesque Jewish behavior, when he's freed from academic conventions. It appears to be necessary that whites develop some sort of solid, tough, firm, international mutual organisational opposition. And also in passing, consider the point made for example in Belloc's 'The Jews' and Ramsay's 'The Nameless War', and Nesta Webster who was mentioned approvingly by Churchill, about Jews targeting aristocracies; it's easy to miss the point that aristocrats had their problems, had difficult decisions to make, and no doubt expected some competence and some shelter. Probably Jewish instincts ultimately operated against aristocracies. Imagine their contempt for people such as Giuliani, McNamara, Professor Evans, the Manchester police chief at Manchester fake bomb shuffling through his script, not to mention simple white soldiers just following orders and perhaps finding themselves homeless [..] Probably they went for ambitious but rather ordinary types, of the Emperor Constantine type. (See http://www.big-lies.org/general/early-christianity-bible.html). The outcome in Russia was a disaster, devastating the country, no doubt erasing many nations from the huge land empire. Apart from thefts and murders, it was funded by Jews from outside the country, American, British, German, Italian companies to import factories, mining plants. Finally their exit strategy was to collapse it in 1991. General impression is that Freemasons are dishonourable, shifty, cunning, backstabber types. It's worth making a note here on mimicry, which impressed Belloc particularly: 'a Jew will pass his life in, say, three different communities in turn, and in each the people who have met him will testify that he seemed just like themselves. [example of a Jew in Germany, then France, then USA] ... his German name had been pronounced after the German fashion. In France, where German names are common, he retained it, but had it pronounced in French fashion. On reaching the United States it was changed to a Scotch name which it distantly resembled ... ... this marvellous characteristic in the Jews ... differentiates them from all the rest of mankind. Had that characteristic power of superficial mutation been absent, the nineteenth century policy would have broken down as completely as the corresponding Northern policy towards the Negro broke down in the United States. ....the amazing fact that a Jew takes on with inexplicable rapidity the colour of his environment. That unique characteristic was the support of the Liberal attitude and was at the same time its necessary condition.' - Mimicry in my view extends far beyond Belloc's description. The New York Times mimics a genuine newspaper. Huge publishing industries mass market books with pseudonymous imitative authors, who remove any parts they dislike. Publishing goes in cycles, with for example new holohoax stories every few years. Magazines like Time and the Nat geographic masquerade as academic and reliable, though they seem to be dying at long last. Their fake judges decide wherever possible for Jews. There are fake websites omitting everything about Jews. There are fake youtubes; I noticed one which seems to have been removed by a pullovered blowhard on as Palestinians as 'crybabies'. Jewish films habitually repeat Jewish lies: Mandela, Gandhi, war films... Mimicry is one thing, but constructive work is something else. The USSR originated more or less nothing apart from killing techniques and lies: they didn't even invent battery chickens. In practice Jews fall back on repetitions, usually disguised, of their past: an entire 'British' TV series as based on Jack the Ripper, for example. Films and advertising by Jew agencies illustrate the same thing, with endless promotions of their own books, films, faces. By now, many people have latched on to the systematic use of mixed race and anti-white campaigns, and possibly to a greater extent to the pushing of family damage and absurd perversions. The world may end up like the USSR but without external support from Jews. Nothing will work, science will fail, utilities will vanish, thefts and crime climb, buildings decay, Jewish rage and murders and screeching go up, while lucky whites try to vanish into hobbies and evasions, and others be forced to fight. The slow decline of Rome maybe provides a model; H G Wells's friend Gissing wrote a novel, Veranilda, which included the loss of many practical skills. So-called 'multicultural' areas may end fractured, groups having no urge to assimilate, with loyalty only to family or caste. India and Brazil may provide models with no group near a majority. This may be the object of Jews, though, being parasites, they may well ignore the problems of technique and skill until it's too late. A trick worth noting is the occasional death as a fuse for violence: Patrick Moore, a sort of astronomer, hated the Germans throughout WW2; A N Whitehead's son was killed during WW1, to his appalling grief. Just two examples: in these cases people seem to think people under attack should not fight back. And of course false flags combined with media repetition are, or appear to be, effective. 9/11 is a perfect example. A subexample is the single issue repetition: Hitler won, or was said to have won, a military award: so he was deadly. Obama and Kissinger got Nobel Peace Prizes; so they must be peaceful. Signs said no Irish, no blacks. However, these days it may be easier to check on lies, with a similar result to Jews baffled when they're shown video proof. =============== Anyway, let's look at the interplay between propaganda and education from, say, 1900. -A H Lane claimed that the entire British education system, notably after 1918, was skewed to the Classic languages, with the intended result that few people could read German, French, Russian and so on. -I found from a biography of David Attenborough that he for a time helped control TV news output. The entire staff of the BBC is essentially Jewish, and had a lot to cover up, including Eisenhower's and Stalin's killing fields. -Secrets such as the British or 'British' official plea that Russian atrocities be not mentioned, and the demand for war made by Freemasons, were of course kept rigidly. -I wrote a section http://big-lies.org/jewish-propaganda-UK/jewish-propaganda-books.html from 1908-1948 including the Jewish 'Left Book Club' and its propaganda. And Penguin books, plus their deliberate printing of the names of collaborator printers -Remember Rupert Murdoch was part of the entire lie machinery of the press. Think of the lies he assisted -Typical books; suggesting the entire education system was bent to incorporate different types of deception -C V Wedgwood 'The King's War' 1958. A general theme of the time is virtually no mention of money, leaving Veronica Wedgwood free to describe the so-called civil war in detail, but omitting the most important part. And wars as spontaneous, but not planned and coerced. - Here's 'Education and the Labour Movement 1870-1920', published by Lawrence and Wishart, Jewish publishers careful not to discuss Jews. -Several books on constitutional history, careful to fluff expulsion of Jews -A paperback on 'the property boom' by Oliver Marriott, saying nothing about Jewish finance -A 1970 sociology book and a 1978 book on mugging - a 'socially constructed phenomenon' -Jewish Year Book - vast numbers of organizations, all of course Jewish centred. -A 2009 book by Andrew Marr, a BBC hack producing nothing important in 'the making of modern Britain' -My reviews in big-lies.org/reviews/ including ---- -Spycatcher by Peter Wright -Lane Alien Menace -Hobsbawm - age of extremes -Denis Healey obituary -GCHQ - Richard Aldridge -K J B Rose Associates 'British Race Relations' Jewish promoted immigration -Eysenck & Kamin -J P Rushton's Race, Evolution, Behavior -L Dominelli: Anti-Racist Social Work part of the whole process of censoring out lack of achievements by low-IQ blacks and others. -K. B. MacDonald's Culture of Critique -Karen Armstrong on Islam -Cox and Marx: is ideological Islam compatible with democracy? or similar -Conway's Demographic History of Britain -Myles Harris's UK Asylum Policy -Grayling: Struggles for Liberty & Rights. -Arthur Koestler: Hanged by the Neck. -Noam Chomsky's Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda -bibi van der Zee protestors handbook -Kate Hudson on CND reviews of dawkins, martin Gardner, Bertrand Russell; films DVDs inc rillington Place gruesome post-1945